AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
![]() ![]() Second, as you can see in the above diagram, rebasing also results in a perfectly linear project history-you can follow the tip of feature all the way to the beginning of the project without any forks. First, it eliminates the unnecessary merge commits required by git merge. The major benefit of rebasing is that you get a much cleaner project history. But, instead of using a merge commit, rebasing re-writes the project history by creating brand new commits for each commit in the original branch. This moves the entire feature branch to begin on the tip of the main branch, effectively incorporating all of the new commits in main. The easiest option is to merge the main branch into the feature branch using something like the following: To incorporate the new commits into your feature branch, you have two options: merging or rebasing. Now, let’s say that the new commits in main are relevant to the feature that you’re working on. ![]() This results in a forked history, which should be familiar to anyone who has used Git as a collaboration tool. Both of these commands are designed to integrate changes from one branch into another branch-they just do it in very different ways.Ĭonsider what happens when you start working on a new feature in a dedicated branch, then another team member updates the main branch with new commits. The first thing to understand about git rebase is that it solves the same problem as git merge. In this article, we’ll compare git rebase with the related git merge command and identify all of the potential opportunities to incorporate rebasing into the typical Git workflow. The git rebase command has a reputation for being magical Git hocus pocus that beginners should stay away from, but it can actually make life much easier for a development team when used with care. Although I did create an app that allows you generate ObjectId compatible values (see it here Mongo ObjectId Generator).Īll the test and a quick explanation of what we’re doing and why we’re doing it, culminating in our glorious use of fineProperty, is on GitHub /HugoDF/mock-mongo-object-id. We don’t want actual ObjectIds strewn around our code. ![]() It’s useful to testing code that uses things like Mongo’s ObjectId. That’s great for setting functions as method mocks. The gist of fineProperty use with a function value boils down to:Ĭonst obj = console.log(obj.yes()) // false or true depending on the call :D As you can see, the yes property is not enumerated, but it does exist. non-enumerable properties that are functions. This post goes through how to use fineProperty to mock how constructors create methods, ie. #javascript JavaScript fineProperty for a function: create mock object instances in Jest or AVA Updates were rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind its remote counterpart. No rebase(s): merge the remote branch into local We’re now going to explore how to achieve a state in the local branch where the remote won’t reject the push. How can you get your local branch back to a state that’s pushable? These 2 cases should be dealt with differently. There tend to be 2 types of changes to the remote branch: someone added commits or someone modified the history of the branch (usually some sort of rebase). “the tip of your current branch is behind its remote counterpart” means that there have been changes on the remote branch that you don’t have locally. Remotes are useful to share your work or collaborate on a branch. a GitHub/GitLab/BitBucket/self-hosted Git server repository instance). A remote equates roughly to a place where you git repository is hosted (eg. A remote branch is one that exists on the remote location (most repositories usually have a remote called origin). ![]() A local branch is a branch that exists in your local version of the git repository. Git works with the concept of local and remote branches. What causes ”tip of your current branch is behind”? ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |